|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 38 post(s) |
Milton Middleson
Rifterlings
Point Blank Alliance
546
   |
Posted - 2014.10.09 18:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Quote:All ships designated as having a "hauling" role in ISIS (ie the following ship groups: Industrial, Blockade Runner, Deep Space Transport, Industrial Command Ship, Freighter) will similarly get a 90% reduction to distance counted for the purpose of fatigue generation. Obviously they can't jump themselves, but this also applies on use of bridges or portals.
This makes it extremely likely that you will see these ships used as bridge taxis in order to move people and material around as quickly as before. I think you should seriously reconsider this. |
Milton Middleson
Rifterlings
Point Blank Alliance
546
|
Posted - 2014.10.09 18:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yroc Jannseen wrote:Milton Middleson wrote:Quote:All ships designated as having a "hauling" role in ISIS (ie the following ship groups: Industrial, Blockade Runner, Deep Space Transport, Industrial Command Ship, Freighter) will similarly get a 90% reduction to distance counted for the purpose of fatigue generation. Obviously they can't jump themselves, but this also applies on use of bridges or portals. This makes it extremely likely that you will see these ships used as bridge taxis in order to move people and material around as quickly as before. I think you should seriously reconsider this. Not likely. Blockade runners are still pretty vulnerable to bubbles and cost near 200m now. If someone has a choice between taking jump bridges but potentially losing a 200m ship or taking an interceptor that costs a lot less and is bubble immune, they'll take the interceptor.
You realize it applies to regular industrials as well? Many of which are cheap-as-free and can be made fairly agile. |
Milton Middleson
Rifterlings
Point Blank Alliance
548
|
Posted - 2014.10.09 21:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
If you're going to boost the range on JFs, consider reducing the fatigue reduction factor from 90% to 80% or 75%. The added range still makes long-ranged logistics possible, but the increased fatigue accumulation makes the decision to use a JF nontrivial. |
Milton Middleson
Rifterlings
Point Blank Alliance
550
|
Posted - 2014.10.10 02:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Querns wrote:El Deuce wrote:Who wants to design the first fleet comp that'll fit inside a t1 hauler repackaged? If it's a Deep Space Transport (and you have Transport Ships 5, I think,) you can fit a packaged battleship inside its fleet hangar with about 10k to spare for modules and ammo. Nevermind that they align and warp like pigs.
You can fit a T3 + fittings in pretty much any t1 industrial, including the fast ones. You'll be able to get your Ishtar into anything with equal or greater capacity than a badger. Just make sure you scout the gate. |
Milton Middleson
Rifterlings
Point Blank Alliance
550
|
Posted - 2014.10.10 02:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kiwinoob wrote:Milton Middleson wrote:You can fit a T3 + fittings in pretty much any t1 industrial, including the fast ones. You'll be able to get your Ishtar into anything with equal or greater capacity than a badger. Just make sure you scout the gate. Should be fun watching the killmails of all the T1 indy's with T3's in the hold :)
Scouting is hard. |
|
|
| |
|